Type to search

Opinion

School Choice Works — for a Third of the Cost

Share

School choice opponents frequently claim the Washington, D.C., school voucher
program is a failure. But I have a hunch that’s going to change
pretty soon.

The previous federal evaluation of the D.C. Opportunity
Scholarship Program found negative effects on math test scores and
no effects on reading test scores after two years. But the most recent evaluation, just released Wednesday, found
that winning a lottery to use a voucher to attend a private school
in D.C. had no effects on math or reading test scores after three
years.

Though seemingly lackluster, these results are actually great
news for school choice.

The most recent federal
evaluation of the D.C. voucher program finds that it increases
student satisfaction and safety, and decreases absenteeism, at a
third of the cost of public schools.

Public schools in D.C. spend around
$28,000
per student each year, while the average private school
voucher amount is only around $9,600 per student each year in D.C..
That means a K-12 education costs around $364,000 for each child in
D.C. public schools, but only about $125,000 for each voucher
student.

That’s right — the federal evaluation reveals that private
schools produce the same academic outcomes for only a third of the
cost of the public schools. In other words, school choice is a
great investment.

But that’s not all.

This study adds to the mounting evidence that school vouchers are tickets to safer schools. Students
that won the voucher lottery to attend a private school were 34%
more likely to report being in a very safe school than their peers
in public schools. While students using vouchers took three years
to catch up to their public school peers on math test scores, the
federal evaluation found positive safety effects every year.
Two other experimental evaluations have
similarly found that school vouchers improve school safety.

The D.C. voucher program also increased students’ satisfaction
with their schools by 18% and decreased chronic absenteeism by 27%
after three years. Imagine that: When a student is satisfied with
their school, and they feel safe while they’re there, they are more
likely to show up to class each day.

But how do private schools compete with D.C. public schools with
a third of the funding per student?

It’s pretty simple. Basic economic theory suggests we shouldn’t
be surprised that private schools do more with less. Private
schools must cater to the needs of their customers (families) if
they want to keep their doors open. Public schools, on the other
hand, hold strong monopoly power because of residential assignment
and funding through property taxes.

The most recent federal evaluation of the D.C. voucher program
finds that it increases student satisfaction and safety, and
decreases absenteeism, at a third of the cost of public schools.
That’s obviously a great investment. But why do students receive a
third of the funding for simply choosing a school that works for
them? And what kinds of benefits would the program produce if all
students were equitably funded?



You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...
Cato Institute

A public policy research organization dedicated to individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace.

  • 1